TO OTHER  PAGES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Jon L. Breen

Jon L. BreenFor thirty years Jon L. Breen has presided over "The Jury Box" column in Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine while also providing reviews for The Armchair Detective. Jon took over the role of EQMM mystery critic from John Dickson Carr in 1977, and while he relinquished his monthly column duties in 2011 he continues to offer up insightful reviews of new mystery fiction twice a year for EQMM. As a mystery writer himself, Jon has received the Mystery Writers of America’s Edgar Allan Poe Award twice, in 1982 and in 1985. He has written several novels and over 100 short stories (2), and has been a regular contributor to Mystery Scene and a frequent non-political contributor to The Weekly Standard (3).

EQMM has described Jon as "...a novelist, short-story writer, librarian, anthologist, and college English teacher" who has written The Jury Box for EQMM "...with integrity, insight, and style..."
Jon Breen is a longtime devotee of the works of Ellery Queen.  In his article “Ellery Queen,” which comprises one chapter of The Tragedy of Errors, Jon noted that “apart from writing some of the most ingeniously plotted detective novels of their time,” Dannay and Lee also “created one of the few Golden Age detective heroes who grew and developed from book to book.”  This can be said of Jon’s works as well. 
As Mike Grost
(4) points out some of Jon’s earliest literary offerings were as a satirist and The line of reviewers fin EQMM is impressive: Howard Haycraft, Anthony Boucher, John Dickson Carr, Al Hubin, Jon L. Breen and now Steven Steinbock. pastiche artist, mainly writing short spoofs of Golden Age detective writers. Notably, Jon has authored several renowned Queen pastiches and parodies, and has also written articles on the art of the pastiche. Jon has provided us with the following article, also reflecting on the growth of characters and the chronological problems presented in portraying Ellery in modern settings. And the icing on the cake is the re-publication, at the end of the article, of one of Jon’s Ellery Queen parodies, which is set in 1975, contemporaneous with the premiere of the NBC Ellery Queen series, and which echoes the theme of his essay perfectly!

Kurt Sercu
Dale C. Andrews

THE EXPANDABLE CALENDAR OF
ELLERY QUEEN

When Edward D. Hoch and I were asked to write new Ellery Queen cases for the September/October 1999 issue of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine, which commemorated the 70th anniversary of The Roman Hat Mystery, we first had to address a thorny question: in what period should the stories be placed? The 1920s where the saga began? The 1960s where the official saga ended? The peak decades in between? We each decided on the present. In Ed’s “The Circle of Ink,” Ellery lectures to casually-dressed college students with laptop computers, while my “The Gilbert and Sullivan Clue” includes a reference to the coming and much-feared advent of Y2K.

Our decision was an appropriate one. Like Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot, Rex Stout’s Nero Wolfe, and quite a few other detectives long on the scene, Ellery Queen pretty much ignored the problem of aging. Just as The Roman Hat Mystery (1929) was set during the theatrical season of 192-, the principal events of the final Queen novel, A Fine and Private Place (1971), were clearly dated 1967. Ellery the sleuth always lived in the present, and his cases were often packed with current topical references. True, The Finishing Stroke (1958) flashed back to the late 1920s and gave Ellery the sleuth the same birth year, 1905, as his creators Frederic Dannay and Manfred B. Lee. But the resurgent Ellery who resurfaced in The Player on the Other Side (1963) did not seem to have aged beyond 53 or even that far, and his elderly father’s retirement in Inspector Queen’s Own Case (1956) was ignored, permitting the pair to continue through the 1960s pretty much as usual.

The Queen team sometimes went to the extent, ill-advisedly I think, of updating the allusions when their older stories were reprinted. For example, the original version of “Long Shot,” their horse-racing mystery in The New Adventures of Ellery Queen
(1940), refers to Rosemont’s winning time in the 1937 Santa Anita Handicap, but in a 1966 Penguin reprint of The New Adventures, the reference is changed to Vulcan’s Forge’s winning time in 1949, though the rest of the story retains its 1930s feel.

When detectives are depicted on television, of course, a specific period must be decided upon, usually but not always the present. British TV sets Hercule Poirot in the 1920s and 1930s and Christie’s other famous sleuth Miss Marple in the 1950s. When Richard Levinson and William Link adapted Queen for the 1975-76 TV season, they set the stories in the late 1940s, a decision I had fun with in one of my Queen parodies featuring E. Larry Cune.
I’ve done four published stories about the awkwardly named Cune. The first of them, “The Lithuanian Eraser Mystery”
(EQMM, March 1969), was written at the request of Fred Dannay, who loved parodies, and was subsequently reprinted in three anthologies. The second, published in Reverend Robert E. Washer’s fanzine Queen Canon Bibliophile (August 1969) was called “The Idea Man,” a much slighter effort that has never been reprinted. Nor have Cune’s two subsequent appearances in EQMM. “C.I.A.: The Swedish Boot Mystery” (November 1973) was too much tied to its time—C.I.A. in this instance stood for Cune’s Investigatory Archives. “The Adventure of the Disoriented Detective” (September 1976) seemed as hopelessly dated as its predecessor, but the TV series’ recent DVD release has given it a new currency. So here it is, unreprinted since its initial publication.


The Adventure of the Disoriented Detective
                                                                                   © 1976 by Jon L. Breen

Healy,” said Inspector Richard Cune, “I’m worried about E. Larry. You and I never seem to change, but E. Larry is not the man he was.”
A worried frown crossed Sergeant Healy’s beefy face. “What’s the matter with the Maestro, Chief? He seemed fine the last time I saw him, during that Swedish Boot business.”
Yeah, but just lately he’s been acting really funny. Forgetful for one thing—never on time for dinner, misses appointments. Also, he’s always falling over things—I told him he should get his eyes examined, it might be astigmatism, but he says, no, dad, I’m all right, and just goes stumbling on his way.”
Doesn’t sound so serious, Inspector. He must be working on a plot for his next book that’s giving him a hard time. Once he gets it licked, he’ll be his old self.”
I’m not so sure, Healy. If that were the worst of it, I wouldn’t be so worried, but there’s something else.”
What?”
“He doesn’t know what year it is. He keeps talking about how President Truman should do this or that. He can’t understand why he can’t get Jack Benny on the radio. He dresses in 1948 clothes—I don’t know where he gets them. I tell him, ‘E. Larry, it’s 1976, not 1948,’ but he just looks right through me, doesn’t listen. He hums tunes from Finian’s Rainbow, and when I mention Elton John or Mick Jagger, he doesn’t know what I’m talking about.”
Gee, Inspector, I like Forties’ show tunes, too, and I never hear of Elton Who-did-you-say or Mack Jigger either.”
“Okay, okay, so that’s not really our generation. But he also never heard of Kojak or Columbo or Archie Bunker or Johnny Carson, and he thinks Ronald Reagan’s a movie actor.”
Healy whistled. “Gee, Inspector, that sounds serious.”
The birdlike Inspector Cune cocked his head at the fly-stained headquarters clock. “I’d do anything to bring him out of this, and this new case seems to be right up his alley. Or course, he’s an hour late as usual.
At that moment, E. Larry Cune stumbled into his father’s office, banging his head on the door sill in the process. “Gosh, dad, I don’t remember that door being so low.”
“It’s the same as the day this place was built, son,” said his father wearily. “Perhaps you’ve grown.”
You’re getting to be a regular Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Maestro,” said Healy with forced heartiness.
E. Larry gave the sergeant a puzzled look. “Who? What?”
“A giant, like Wilt the Stilt.”
“Wilt the Stilt?” E. Larry echoed, totally confused.
Like George Mikan,” E. Larry’s father explained with a worried frown.
Gee, dad, I’m not that tall,” E. Larry remonstrated.
Enough small talk. I have a tough case here, son, and I need your help.”
Sure, dad, just so it doesn’t take too long. I have a book on the stove that will make the world forget Philo Vance.”
“Look, son, here’s the situation. A man named Charles Talbot was found shot to death last night in his apartment, a rundown place on the east side. Talbot was down on his luck, but he’d enjoyed great success as one of the slickest bunco artists around. In fact, a few years ago, he’d founded a firm of high-rise confidence men, real big-time operators. They were all gray and distinguished-looking types who seemed able to gain the trust of the smartest business minds in New York and suck them into fantastic agreements that would make buying the Brooklyn Bridge from a wino look like a shrewd deal. We managed to rout his gang a few years ago, when they went a step too far, but the mastermind Talbot escaped, and apparently so did one other.”
E. Larry’s features looked blank and bemused. Sergeant Healy inwardly doubted that this slack-jawed sadsack could ever have displayed the incisive, razor-sharp intellect that had been pulling his father’s chestnuts out of the fire for so many years.
“I don’t remember the case, dad. You say his name was Talbot—”
Yes, but he was better-known as Ephraim Dean Arnold. Surely you remember that—half the executives on Manhattan blush at the mention of the name.”
Gee, I don’t, dad. What year was that?”
Healy started to say, “Nineteen seventy—”
“Oh, I don’t know, four or five years ago,” Inspector Cune interrupted quickly. Now that E. Larry was showing some slight interest, he felt that insisting too hard that it was 1976 might case a relapse. It would take great care to ease him back to reality.
“Talbot,” the Inspector continued, “had recently been using the name Gene Arthur Effington and trying to pull some of his same old tricks, with less success. In the pocket of the shirt he was wearing when he did, we found five empty envelopes, each addressed to a prominent executive, people he apparently was going to try one of his bunco schemes on. But there was also an unfinished draft of a letter that we think was intended to go to one of them. We just don’t know which. The letter read:

Dear Joe,

I was certainly disappointed at your failure to acknowledge my previous missive. I hope you know that my congratulations to you as the only one of our old bunch to stay on the top, when the rest of us were dropping like flies, were most sincerely meant. And I wouldn’t want to think that you took my statement about what a word from me in certain prominent ears might do to your present good fortune as anything like a threat. Would I, if you’ll excuse a lapse into the vernacular, rat on a pal?
It happens, though, that I am somewhat financially embarrassed, and surely a true friend would be happy to help out his old associate in a time of

It broke off there. We interpret it to mean that one of the old bunco ring is still out among ‘em, so to speak, and that Talbot was threatening to expose him. And probably the recipient of that first letter sought Talbot out and killed him before the second even got finished and mailed.”
“And it seems likely this second letter was going to go to one of those five executives the envelopes were addressed to.”
“Right, son!”
“And therefore that one of the five addressees is the murderer.”
That’s just what we think, Maestro,” Healy put in.
But which one?”
That’s the problem all right, son,” said Inspector Cune.
“And the name Joe is probably no help, since the executive probably uses an assumed name, probably the same one he used as a member of Talbot’s bunco firm.”
“And there are no Joes on the list anyway. The names are Wilton Frederick Comstock, Albert Gregory Post, Arthur Emsworth Endicott, Milborne Cosmington Fosdick, and Randolph Terwilliger Hooper.”
“A formidable group of names,” E. Larry mused. “Both in terms of influence and total syllables.”
Inspector Cune smiled inwardly. E. Larry was getting involved. Perhaps his grand and glorious brain was about to shake its fog of disorientation.
Dad, what were the names of the other members of Talbot’s bunco firm, the ones you caught up with?”
You want their real names or their aliases?”
Their aliases. I don’t care about their real names.”
Well, there was one who called himself Eldon Jason, posed as a Western self-made millionaire, a rough-hewn character with a shrewd brain for business. He had a nickname. What was it, Healy?”
Beans,” said Healy. “Beans Jason, a real shifty character.”
Then there was Teel Armstrong, Eulalie Esther Jeeter, the only female member of the gang, Ames Eldon, Jason Ephraim Kane—”
Another Ephraim and Eldon,” E. Larry mused. “Not common names. I wonder why they should have been repeated. Did anyone reveal how they came up with these aliases, dad? Did each member of the gang come up with his own false name?”
“No, as a matter of fact, Talbot chose them all himself. Insisted on it. They say he had a genius for coming up with trustworthy names.”
“And usually three names, but not always. Could it be there was some subtle joke hidden in the names he chose? Let’s review the aliases we know originated with Talbot, dad, starting with the ones he used himself. Ephraim Dean Arnold. Gene Arthur Effington. Eldon “Beans” Jason, Teel Armstrong, Eulalie Esther Jeeter, Ames Eldon, Jason Ephraim Kane—I’ve got it!”
To his father’s dismay E. Larry turned away and started talking to a blank wall.
You see it, don’t you? One of the names on the list of executives Arnold was going to write to fits right in with the list of his gang members’ aliases. So perfectly there should be no doubt which of names on the list belongs to a former gang member that Talbot was planning to blackmail. You can figure it out. You know everything I do.”
“E. Larry,” his father roared with exasperation, “who in hell are you talking to?”
E. Larry whirled around. “Nobody, dad, nobody. But I have your case solved. What do all those names have in common? Come on, Healy, you must see it.”
“’Fraid not, Maestro. They’re just a bunch of names.”
Don’t just look at the names on the paper. Say them out loud. Each name includes letters, initials. I don’t mean the first letter of each word. I mean a letter that appears in the word as spoken. Eulalie Esther Jeeter. U.S.G. See what I mean? Or Teel Armstrong. T.R. Or Gene Arthur Effington. G.R.F. And those initials also have something in common.”
What’s that, son,” the Inspector asked, looking at his son blankly.
Take the easiest one of all. Ephraim Dean Arnold. F.D.R.”
“I get it!” Healy cried. “F.D.R.—Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And Jason Ephraim Kane is J.F.K.—John F. Kennedy. They all have the initials of United States Presidents in their names.”
“Right,” said the Inspector. “Eldon ‘Beans’ Jason would be L.B.J.—Lyndon Baines Johnson. And U.S.G. stands for U.S. Grant, T.R. for Theodore Roosevelt. Ames Eldon is A.L.—Abraham Lincoln.”
Now you see why some of the aliases only had two names,” said E. Larry. “To represent the initials of Presidents who only used two names. And the repetition of Ephraim is explained—how many names are there with the initial F pronounced at the beginning of them?”
Let’s see,” said Healy, concentrating intensely like a child with his first jigsaw puzzle. “Gene Arthur Effington would be G.R.F. Who the heck is G.R.F.?”
“Gerald Rudolph Ford, Healy,” the Inspector explained patiently. “Our current President!”
Gee, and that was the hardest one,” said Healy.
Now that we’ve belabored that point to the utmost,” said E. Larry, “let’s look at the list of executives and see which one fits.”
Healy and the Inspector ran their eyes down the list. After a moment, the Inspector said, “It has to be Arthur Emsworth Endicott. R.M.N.”
“Right, dad. The initials of another former President—Richard M. Nixon. Endicott is your man, and I urge you to get him down here for questioning right away.”
But to Inspector Richard Cune, something more important than putting the finger on a probable murderer had taken place. “E. Larry, listen—Nixon and Ford and Johnson and Kennedy all became President after 1960. Do you realize what that means?”
What, dad?” E. Larry asked, puzzled.
“My son, you’ve come back from 1948!”
Welcome home, Maestro,” Healy said heartily.
“I don’t know what you’re talking about,” E. Larry protested. “I know what year it is. But if President Winkler doesn’t do something about the moon colonies pretty soon, I don’t know where this country will be.”
E. Larry was out the door en route to his typewriter before the Inspector or Healy thought to ask him what year it was.


Jon L. Breen

Other articles by this West 87nd Street Irregular
(1)
"“Revisionist History”  at Something is going to Happen (07-18-2012)

Page first published on Sep 1. 2011 
Last updated Jul 17, 201
7
 

© Original text 2011, 1976 Jon L. Breen  Used by permission

TO OTHER  PAGES: 1 2 3  4 5 6 7 8 9


 

Introduction | Floor Plan | Q.B.I. | List of Suspects | Whodunit?  | Q.E.D. | Kill as directed | New | Copyright 

Copyright
© MCMXCIX-MMXIV   Ellery Queen, a website on deduction. All rights reserved.